International Statement Condemning Escalating State Violence on India’s Indigenous Adivasi Communities in Bastar, Chhattisgarh, India


People gathered at the Madhonar protest site with a banner declaring the start of an indefinite protest from Jan 12, 2023, in Bastar Division, Chattisgarh, India. Image: Citizens Report, 2024.

We, the undersigned, urgently draw global attention to the escalating violence by the Government of India and its security forces against the Indigenous Adivasi communities in the Bastar Division of the state of Chhattisgarh, in central India.

Since January 2024, the systematic and severe repression of the Adivasi communities has been escalated, with over 180 extrajudicial killings [estimated number at the time of writing; at time of going to press on 8 May 2025, the estimated number is over 450]; numerous arbitrary arrests, and reports of torture and sexual violence. This escalation underscores the complete negation of universally recognized human rights by the Government of India, in a resource-rich region that has come to be characterized by a longstanding cycle of forced displacement, dispossession, and wrongful and illegal appropriation of Adivasi land and extensive militarization.

The Adivasis of Bastar are the custodians of its biodiverse forests and rely on this ecosystem for their subsistence and livelihoods. Their traditional knowledge and cultural heritage have maintained the delicate balance of the region’s ecology. Despite the Constitution recognizing and protecting the rights of the Adivasi community over their land and resources under the Fifth Schedule, and those granted under the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA), and the Forest Rights Act (FRA), the Government of India has steadily allowed extractive industries to encroach on Adivasi lands. Profit-driven mining enterprises under public-private partnerships and the garb of development has met with stiff local resistance from the Adivasi people.

In response, the Government of India has systematically deployed large numbers of armed forces in the region for over two decades. In 2005, a state-sponsored militia, Salwa Judum, composed of Adivasi youth was launched that targeted Adivasi villages under the guise of combating Naxalite (Maoist) insurgency Employing “strategic hamletting” tactics, Salwa Judum reportedly burned and emptied 644 villages, displacing approximately 350,000 villagers. Civil society reports detail brutal reprisals, including extrajudicial killings, sexual violence, forced relocation to camps and mass scale internal displacement. In 2011, in an interim order, the Supreme Court outlawed the use of Adivasi youth as Special Police Officers (SPOs) in counterinsurgency operations, condemning the state’s tactic of pitting Adivasi against Adivasi. However, despite this ruling, the state is currently deploying the District Reserve Guards (DRG), a force composed of surrendered Naxalites and local youth, as the primary instrument in counterinsurgency operations.

Officially justified as a “counterinsurgency” measure, the heavy military presence directly facilitates mining activities by public-private corporations on Adivasi lands, using violence as a means to remove resisting communities. The violence against Adivasis in Bastar aligns with a broader authoritarian agenda under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration, supported by the Hindu supremacist ideology of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), targeting India's religious and social minorities, and prioritizing corporate enrichment and crony capitalism. In 2022–23, mineral revenue from Chhattisgarh increased, to reach INR 12,941 crores [USD 153 million], with nearly half generated from Bastar’s Dantewada district. During the same time, the civilian-to-security personnel ratio in the region has also increased, to approximately 9:1 in some areas, making Bastar one of the world's most militarized regions. This is manifested by the proliferation of military camps in the region, with camps every 3–4 kilometres in some areas. A recent report notes that “[t]he proliferation of camps has been accompanied by mass arrests, including of many elected representatives, and members of the Moolvasi Bachao Manch. Framing people under Maoist charges is an easy way to silence their legitimate constitutional demands. Based on official figures, 6,804 arrests have been made in Bastar region from 2011 to 2022” [see also below regarding the Moolvasi Bachao Manch].

As the Government of India hides behind the facade of “counterinsurgency” operations, the armed police forces of India act with impunity to intimidate, harass and torture the Adivasi people as well as committing extrajudicial killings and sexual violence. The use of severe, systematic and widespread violence as a means to remove resisting communities from mining areas includes using of state-of-the-art weaponry by the forces, such as drones which are being used reportedly for surveilling the people’s everyday lives and bombing with drone-launched mortar bombs.

The escalation in violence that the region is currently witnessing as well as the massive deforestation and increase in mining activities, is endangering the survival of the Adivasi peoples, and portends severe ecological impacts with implications for India and the global community.

These military operations of the security forces have reportedly led to the deaths of over 180 Adivasis in 2024 alone, with authorities claiming that these are “Naxalites” killed in encounters. However, local Adivasi communities vehemently dispute these claims, alleging that many of these purported encounters were, in fact, staged executions, with victims being unarmed, and picked up from their homes or fields. Moreover, in cases where confrontations with Naxalites have occurred, the police are accused of executing those apprehended instead of following due process. Many were said to carry “bounties on their heads” that are distributed among the units carrying out the operations, which has created further incentive for unlawful executions. All of these violate international humanitarian and human rights law applicable in conflict areas, and Constitutional and legal provisions of India itself.

Another particularly concerning development is Chhattisgarh state’s planned acquisition of 54,543 hectares of the Abujhmad forest in Bastar for an Indian Army training range. This will displace nearly 10,000 Adivasis from 52 villages. The destruction of this unique forest ecosystem will also have cascading effects on biodiversity, water cycles, and climate resilience. Villagers fear that the occupation of these indigenous lands will extend beyond training purposes, potentially involving the Indian Army in military operations against its own citizens. It is in these forests that many of the recent killings have occurred including on 4 October 2024, when 35 people were reported killed.

We also highlight the targeting of youth Adivasi human rights defenders (HRDs) at the forefront of movements in the region to safeguard their lands from forcible land acquisition for military, mining, and other industrial ‘developmental’ projects. The peaceful movements with ongoing sit-in protests at multiple sites across Bastar include the Moolvasi Bachao Manch (Save the Indigenous Peoples’ Movement; MBM) and Maad Bachao Andolan [Save Mount Maad Movement]. On 8 November 2024, eight members of MBM were illegally detained along with about 50 villagers, of which seven MBM members and about 18 villagers remain detained, and on 30 October the Chhattisgarh Government issued a notification in which MBM has been deemed an “unlawful” organisation for a period of one year, highlighting the ongoing crackdown on indigenous activists in Bastar. Previously, Maad Bachao Manch president Lakhma Koram, Adivasi Adhikar Bachao Manch leader Vijendra Korram and MBM co-founder Suneeta Pottam were arrested in false cases. The arrest of Sarju Tekam, convenor of the Bastar Coordination Committee of Mass Movements (Bastar Jan Sangharsh Samanvay Samiti) and the Vice-President of Sarva Adivasi Samaj, a collective of all Adivasi organizations in Chhattisgarh, under anti-terror laws, also exemplifies the intensified suppression of dissent.

The heavy militarization of Bastar also has direct and indirect environmental impacts. Security forces, operating in ecologically sensitive areas, establishing camps, constructing multi-lane highways and using explosives are destroying natural habitats and impacting wildlife. The drone surveillance and mortar bombings inflict additional ecological stress, including forest fires and soil degradation. Such activities not only endanger local species but also undermine the regenerative capacity of these ecosystems.

A Call for Urgent International Intervention

What is unfolding in Bastar is not merely a territorial conflict or insurgency—it is a struggle for survival, dignity, and the recognition of Indigenous rights in the face of state violence and corporate greed.

We do not use these words lightly. The situation in Bastar demands immediate and decisive action. People across the world must act now to end the cycle of repression and to ensure that the voices of Adivasi communities are heard and respected. Silence in the face of the Government of India's atrocities would make the world complicit in the erasure of indigenous communities in this region.

We, therefore, call on people all over the world to demand:

  • Immediate Cessation of State Violence: Demand an immediate end to all forms of state violence against the Adivasi communities in Bastar, including extrajudicial killings, arbitrary arrests, and torture. The ongoing violence, carried out under the pretext of counterinsurgency, must cease immediately, and those responsible for human rights violations must be held accountable.

  • Demilitarization of Bastar: Call for the urgent demilitarization of Bastar and the dismantling of military camps in the region. The extensive militarization, which has transformed Bastar into one of the world’s most militarized zones, must be reversed. The Government of India must prioritize peaceful dialogue and political engagement with Adivasi communities over military and security measures. The Adivasis’ legitimate demands for autonomy, land rights, and self-determination must be addressed through political solutions, not violence.

  • Compliance with Supreme Court Orders: Demand that the Government of India fully complies with the 2011 Supreme Court order prohibiting the recruitment of Adivasi youth for military operations. This practice violates both domestic and international law.

  • Respect for Constitutional and Legal Protections: Demand full enforcement of constitutional and legal protections for Adivasi communities, including the Forest Rights Act (FRA), Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA), and the Fifth Schedule, to protect Adivasi land from state and corporate encroachment.

  • End to Land Grabbing and Adherence to the Principle of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC): The Government of India must halt all plans to acquire Indigenous lands for military, mining, or industrial purposes without the Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) of affected Adivasi communities. Any land use must be contingent on Adivasi consent, free from coercion. This includes the planned acquisition of 54,543 hectares of the Abujhmad forest for an Indian Army training range.

  • Protection of Human Rights Defenders and Activists: Demand the protection of Adivasi human rights defenders from threats, arrests, and harassment. End the unlawful detention of activists, including members of Moolvasi Bachao Manch and Maad Bachao Manch, and stop the repression of Indigenous movements.

  • Accountability for Violations of Human Rights and International Law: Hold the Government of India accountable for violations of international law and human rights in Bastar, including the use of drone surveillance, mortar bombings, and military operations that cause ecological harm and loss of life. Those responsible must face justice.

By endorsing these demands at this urgent hour, people across the world can play a pivotal role in holding the Indian government accountable for its actions and fostering a resolution that upholds the dignity and sovereignty of indigenous peoples. We call on governments, international human rights organizations, and the global public to stand in solidarity with the Adivasi communities in Bastar in their struggle for justice, dignity, and the preservation of their land and culture.

 

 

Updates to statement: January to April 2025

January 2025 Update

Since we opened our statement to signatories in November 2024, the number of people killed in Bastar increased exponentially and as of 10 January 2025, over 280 people had been killed as per news reports.

February 2025 Update

The killings and other violations continue in Bastar. Also, on 27 February 2025, the 23-year-old Moolvasi Bachao Manch Bastar Division President Raghu Midiyami, was arrested on fabricated charges of 'anti-national' activities by the elite National Investigation Agency under the anti-terror Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. We condemn this arrest of an exemplary youth Adivasi human rights defender who has been demanding the state to implement the legal and constitutional rights of the Adivasi communities in Bastar.

April 2025 Update

24 April: Intensification of military operations in the Adivasi regions of central India

According to media and ground reports, security operations of an unprecedented scale are currently ongoing across these regions. In the Karregutta hills and adjacent areas alone, more than 20,000 security personnel have reportedly been deployed to encircle approximately 1,000 members of the Communist Party of India (Maoist), a political organisation primarily composed of Adivasis. Heavy and consistent firing is being reported, including bombing.

This militarised offensive is being conducted despite multiple public statements by the CPI (Maoist) offering a one-month ceasefire and readiness for unconditional peace talks, contingent solely on the government's suspension of military operations. In fact, they have already declared a unilateral ceasefire, instructing their cadres not to initiate any attacks unless provoked or fired upon.

Rather than seizing this opportunity for dialogue, the Indian state has responded by intensifying its assault. Whether or not one agrees with the political programme of the CPI (Maoist), its members are Indian citizens—many of them Indigenous people asserting their constitutional right to defend their lands, forests, and autonomy. A democratic state cannot claim legitimacy while unleashing violent repression against a political formation that has explicitly sought negotiation.

An urgent appeal has been sent to President Droupadi Murmu by hundreds of Indian civil society organisations and individuals, clearly stating that a unilateral ceasefire by the government is not a matter of political charity, but a constitutional obligation rooted in India's foundational values.

On the killings

The killings in Bastar have intensified further, with a disturbing surge in extrajudicial executions carried out under the guise of 'encounters', driven by a state-sanctioned reward system. After each killing, the state issues press releases claiming the deceased was a Maoist with a reward on their head—yet these bounties are almost always declared posthumously, and no public list of wanted individuals has ever been released. In this perverse economy of death, posthumously declared cash rewards are used to retroactively legitimise executions, then disbursed among security personnel upon the production of a body. Death becomes the evidence, the justification, and the reward. This has commodified killing and institutionalised impunity on an industrial scale.

Around 400 people have been killed since November 2024, with at least 165 in the first four months of 2025. One estimate suggests that up to one-third of those killed since January 2024 may have been unarmed civilians. Even where Maoist party members were killed, eyewitness accounts indicate that these too were custodial executions — not battlefield fatalities. The majority of those affiliated with the Maoist party who have been killed are themselves Adivasis, including a significant number of Indigenous women fighters.

Bastar is no longer just a site of conflict — it is being transformed into a killing field. What we are witnessing is not counterinsurgency but a slow-motion genocide, enabled by militarised governance, judicial silence, and global indifference. If this machinery of violence is not dismantled, the very survival of Indigenous communities in Bastar stands at grave risk.

On Raghu Midiyami

Since Raghu Midiyami’s arrest on 27 February 2025, it has come to light that he was seriously injured in a road accident shortly before his detention. Despite suffering from visible injuries to his hands, legs, and neck, he was arrested and remanded to custody without any medical attention. Since then, his condition has reportedly deteriorated further, yet he continues to be denied adequate medical care. Instead of ensuring treatment, the NIA obtained seven days of custodial interrogation and transported him to Raipur — over 280 kilometres from the Jagdalpur prison where he was originally lodged. The denial of urgent medical care while under custodial interrogation amounts to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment — and forms part of a broader pattern of state reprisal against Indigenous rights defenders in Bastar.

 
 

 
 

Signatories

Organizations


  1. International Solidarity with Academic Freedom in India (InSAF India) (worldwide)

  2. India Justice Project, Germany

  3. Foundation the London Story, Netherlands

  4. London Mining Network, UK

  5. Indian Alliance Paris

  6. Abe Hayeem, Chair of Architects and Planners for Justice in Palestine

  7. South Asian Diaspora Action Collective (SADAC)

  8. Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)

  9. Continental Network of Indigenous Women of the Americas/ECMIA

  10. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA), Copenhagen

  11. International Land Coalition, Asia

  12. Land Forum India (International Land Coalition)

  13. International Indigenous Peoples Movement for Self-Determination and Liberation

  14. Other indias, Amsterdam

  15. Ekō (International)

  16. India Labour Solidarity (UK)

  17. Money Rebellion UK

  18. Transform South Asia

  19. SOAS Bla(c)k Panthers

  20. Money Rebellion London

  21. Solifonds, Switzerland

  22. Coal Action Network, UK

  23. Ecoforensic CIC

  24. Rational Medicine Network

  25. South Asia Solidarity Group

  26. Hindus for Human Rights, International

  27. Stoke Palestine Solidarity Campaign (UK)

  28. India Civil Watch International

  29. Corner House

  30. POSSIBLE FUTURES, Phillipines/Brazil

  31. Earth Thrive, UK/Serbia

  32. Yes to Life, No to Mining, Global (64 orgs)

  33. CATAPA vzw

  34. Revolutionary Writers Association

  35. Stop Operation Kagaar Committee, United States

  36. Anti-imperialist front, UK

  37. Land Skills Hub, UK

  38. Food Not Cops Brum, Birmingham, UK

  39. The RYSE (Radical Youth Space for Educations), UK

  40. International League of Peoples' Struggle UK

  41. Leeds Students Against Apartheid Coalition, UK

  42. Red Guards - Sheffield, UK

  43. Global Majority Copwatch, UK

  44. Revolutionary Students' Front, West Bengal, India

  45. Queers For Palestine Birmingham, UK

  46. Alleanza friulana Domini collettivi, Ravascletto - Friuli – Italia

  47. End Fossil Occupy, Utrecht

  48. Utrecht University Encampment

  49. Justice For All Canada

  50. Campaign to Defend Nature and People

  51. Comité Ambiental en Defensa de la Vida

  52. Kalikasan People's Network for the Environment

  53. International League of Peoples' Struggle - Commission on Environment and Climate Justice

  54. Peoples Rising for Climate Justice

  55. cBalance

  56. Roots for Equity

  57. Rede Cosmopolíticas

  58. Center for Environmental Concerns – Philippines
    Asia Pacific Network of Environmental Defenders


Individuals


  1. Chihiro Geuzebroek, Pax peace prize winner 2022 and cofounder Aralez Foundation

  2. Gail Orduna, Global Coordinator of People's Coalition on Food Sovereignty

  3. Maddy Ryle, TerraJusta

  4. Lotika Singha, InSAF India

  5. Partho Sarothi Ray

  6. Sruti Bala, University of Amsterdam

  7. Mary Mathai

  8. Ritumbhra Manuvie, University of Groningen

  9. Henna Amin

  10. Shishu Ranjan

  11. Anisha Pucadyil, London

  12. Sacha Ismail, Worker in UK fire service, activist in trade unions FBU and UNISON

  13. Minesh Parekh, Councillor for Crookes and Crosspool, Sheffield City Council, UK

  14. Prabir KC

  15. Rafela Fitzhugh, Fossil Free Science Museum, UK

  16. Sarah Kinlen

  17. Mike Rowley

  18. Gopa Roy

  19. Sofia Karim, Turbine Bagh, London

  20. Malcolm Hunter, Labour Party, UNISON and Friends of the Earth

  21. Abha Sur

  22. Sana Rizvi

  23. Alba Fieira Vilariño

  24. Roshan Lal, India Labour Solidarity UK

  25. Thomas Niblett

  26. Chris Flanagan, UNISON South Staffordshire & Shropshire Healthcare Branch

  27. Yvonne Zimmermann, Solifonds

  28. Jake Simms, London Mining Network

  29. Surinder Guru

  30. Emma Scholin Tipping

  31. Charlotte Tipping

  32. Dr Andy Higginbottom

  33. Ronak M Soni

  34. Prof. Felix Padel

  35. Subjr Sinha, London

  36. Alessandra Mezzadri, SOAS

  37. Madhusudhan Raman, University of Delhi

  38. Gayatri Chakrvorty Spivak, Columbia University

  39. Saad Quasem, SOAS University of London

  40. Dr Vanja Hamzić, SOAS, University of London

  41. Jens Lerche, SOAS, University of London

  42. Vinita Damodaran, University of Sussex

  43. Madhuvadhani M

  44. Emily Cox, University of Oxford

  45. Dillon Maxwell, UCU

  46. Aksha Fernandez

  47. Prof Louiza Odysseos

  48. Prof Lyla Mehta, Institute of Development Studies, UK (personal endorsement only not institutional)

  49. Peter Murrsy

  50. Raymond Ruhaak

  51. Richard Widdess

  52. Rhiannon Lockley, UCU Equality Chair (Personal Capacity)

  53. Ain Contractor, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education

  54. Gilbert Achcar, SOAS, University of London

  55. Jacob Norris, University of Sussex, UK

  56. David Ludden, New York University

  57. Dr. Mihika Chatterjee, Bath, UK

  58. Usha Iyer, Stanford University

  59. Manjeet Ramgotra, SOAS University of London

  60. Egbert Wever, Extinction Rebellion Landbouw the Netherlands

  61. John van Soest, Netherlands

  62. Daniela Garcia-Caro, Agroecologie Netwerk

  63. Karuna DW, Bangalore

  64. Rita Manchanda, Delhi

  65. Helen de Bruijn        

  66. Swetha Dandapani

  67. Roshmi Goswami, South Asians For Human Rights

  68. bas eeckels, Amsterdam

  69. Maithri, the Netherlands

  70. Pallavi Banerjee, Canada

  71. Irene Shankar, Professor of Sociology

  72. Gabor Papp

  73. Saswati Ghosh, Kolkata

  74. Rohan D'Souza, Kyoto University

  75. Simon Senn

  76. Suzanne Senn

  77. Jo Goutrié, the Netherlands

  78. E. Smeets

  79. Adwait Gaikwad, University of Witwatersrand

  80. Karan Singha

  81. Suchetana Ghosh, Kolkata

  82. Professor David Treece, King's College London

  83. Ruben Reus

  84. Prakriti, Feminist researcher

  85. Prajval Shastri

  86. Dr Philipp Zehmisch, South Asia Institute, Heidelberg University

  87. Thabo Huntgeburth, SOAS, London

  88. Marco Bassi, University of Palermo

  89. Biraj Mehta

  90. Randall Sequeira, Odisha

  91. Tatiana Lukman

  92. Katy Coxall

  93. Matti Baten

  94. Rob Lennon

  95. Marloes van Overbeeke, Driebergen Netherlands

  96. Eathaar E

  97. Sonja Bleeker

  98. Spies

  99. Sabine Feuillet, France

  100. Mead Christine, Marseille

  101. Akudo McGee

  102. Julia Sallabank

  103. Esther Kuiler

  104. Yassica Hadytia, National Student Front (FMN) Yogyakarta, Indonesia

  105. Dayton Andrews, Committee to Stop Operation Kagaar, USA

  106. Arya Baburaj, Researcher

  107. Salisha Chandra

  108. Lucian Stephenson

  109. Louisa dix

  110. Amanda Waters

  111. Colin Walker

  112. Sharanya Nayak

  113. Otto, Red Guard, UK

  114. Nikita Naidu, Climate Action Specialist

  115. Deepak Kumar, Campaign Against State Repression

  116. Pradyumna Behera, IIT Bombay

  117. Kristina Babiera, PCFS Global Secretariat - Philippines

  118. Asir Newaz Khan

  119. Gaurav Bansal

  120. Juana Vera Delgado, Water Justice and Gender

  121. Dr Christopher Ugwu, Enugu, Nigeria

  122. Sylva van Rosse

  123. Marcus Colchester

  124. Michel Pimbert

  125. Salam Rajesh, IUCN CEESP

  126. Mahatsangy Toavina RAZOLALAINA

  127. Deepti Mary Minj

  128. Haritha

  129. Tameem Hasan

  130. Vyshali S

  131. Prashant Rahi, The Polis Project

  132. AS Vasantha Kumari

  133. vs krishna, Human Rights Forum

  134. K. Sudha, Human Rights Forum, Vishakapatnam

  135. Pragati Parihar

  136. Prasad Chacko, Social Worker

  137. Elisabeth Reis

  138. Surya Teja Gavva, Rutgers University, Lenapehoking

  139. Ramu

  140. Laila Kadiwal

  141. Lisa McLaughlin

  142. Cadmus Atake-Enade

  143. Anne Ellison-Webb

  144. Carol Scheller

  145. Maya Seshagiri

  146. Shruti

  147. Abhayraj Naik

  148. Vidushi Kaushik

  149. Rajesh Ramakrishnan


International Solidarity for Academic Freedom in India (InSAF India) is a collective of diasporic Indians across the globe. It advocates for collective academic freedoms and building global solidarities with Indian and international peoples’ movements for radical social, economic and ecological justice.

Next
Next

Eqbal Ahmad for a Time of Monsters